Like all right thinking people in our nation's capital, the Washington Post supports President Bush's bailout. However, its single-minded pursuit of fiscal austerity led it to make an assertion that would be good grounds for defeating the package. The Post told readers that, "when you strip away all the rhetoric, pro and con, TARP amounts to a deliberate but as-yet-unquantifiable reduction in our future wealth -- for the sake of our present stability."
Actually, the other proponents of the bill are claiming that the bailout will increase our future wealth. The claim is that the bailout will prevent a sharper downturn, thereby maintaining higher levels of output. This increases national wealth, although it could mean a larger federal debt. It's not clear if the Post differs with other proponents of the bailout, and actually thinks it will lower output or whether it equates the national debt with the country's wealth. In either case, the Post appears to hold a very peculiar view of either the bailout or the economy.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and we've fallen behind on reaching our goal. Any amount you give today will bring us closer to making our reporting possible—and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations, so your impact will be doubled.
