The NYT reports how medical scans are often inaccurate. It also reports that doctors often profit from referring patients to get scans at facilities where they have an ownership stake.
The problems with scans can be substantially reduced if scans were billed at their marginal cost. The marginal cost of a scan would likely be $100 or less in most cases. It would include the cost of the electricity, the time for the medical personnel to run the scan and the time for a technician/doctor to review the scan.
This situation would require that the cost of developing scanning technology be covered through some other mechanism. It is almost certainly the case that there are more efficient funding mechanisms than the current one of relying on government created patent monopolies.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.