Byron York's interview with former Heritage Foundation scholar Jason Richwine is illuminating, not because of any new information-it's well-established that Richwine has written for white nationalist websites and drew ideas and inspiration from "race realists" like Charles Murray-but because Richwine follows the pattern of everyone outed for their racism. He denies it. Strenuously:
Richwine knew he was in trouble the minute the first story broke. "The accusation of racism is one of the worst things that anyone can call you in public life," he says. "Once that word is out there, it's very difficult to recover from it, even when it is completely untrue." […]
Remember, this isn't an idle accusation-Richwine is part of a community of race and IQ researchers who maintain that IQ differences between racial groups are partially explained by genetics, despite the fact that there's nothing genetic that makes someone "black" or "white." It's historical and social circumstance that places Barack Obama and Denzel Washington (or Ted Cruz and George Lopez) into the same category, not biology.
In other words, Richwine's work-his premise that racial IQ differences have biological origins tied to the particular "races"-is racist by definition. There's no other way to describe it.
This is par for the course. Whenever someone is accused of racism-even if they are caught saying something patently racist-the response is to deny that they could ever hold any prejudice. We all acknowledge that there is racism in the United States, but we strenuously deny that there are any actual racists. Jason Richwine once detailed a hierarchy of racial IQ, telling an audience that "you have Jews with the highest average IQ, usually followed by East Asians, then you have non-Jewish whites, Hispanics, and then blacks."
If this isn't racism, then what is?
